Allow
me to introduce you to In
a Lonely Place-
it's chilling, it's creepy, it messes with your head, and it is
FANTASTIC.
My
copy of this novel was published by The Feminist Press as part of a
series called "Femme Fatales: Women Write Pulp," in an
effort to bring back mid-century classic pulp stories written by
women, including noir. Like a parallel effort in the realm of
mid-19th century American sentimental fiction, this series
reintroduces us to the rich and varied world of crime/noir fiction
that wasn't just hard-boiled male detectives pawing bad girls with
too much lipstick while hunting down murderers and tossing them to
the cops. No, noir was much more than that: it included many female
writers, like Hughes, Highsmith, and Sayers, who explored the
20th-century American psyche and the hidden depths of many so-called
"ordinary" people. Why did some people become killers? What
kind of figurative masks did they wear to pass unnoticed, permitting
them to murder while also moving about in cultured society?
Inevitably,
In a Lonely Place
took me back to that unfortunate time when I read Bret Easton Ellis's
American Psycho.
I say "unfortunate" because it's really the one book I wish
I could unread. (It was assigned as part of my senior seminar in
college, but I just couldn't finish it). If you've subjected yourself
to this book, you'll remember the painfully descriptive and detailed
explanations on the part of the narrator concerning the horrifying
and brutal things he did to his female prey. And all the while, he
hobnobbed with fellow rich people and acted like any normal late-20th
century single man. It was even harder to read American
Psycho
because it was narrated in the first-person- inhabiting the mind of a
sadistic psycho-killer was just too much. But mostly it was too
graphic for me.
In
a Lonely Place,
however, has all of the self-deluded-psycho-killer freakishness
you'll find in American
Psycho
without all the details. Actually, with almost no details of the
rapes and murders at all. Hughes, instead, focuses on Dix Steele's
thoughts, through which the novel is channeled. We only see the world
through Steele's eyes, which heightens the suspense and forces us as
readers to think like a detective, analyzing each of Steele's
thoughts and suspicions and weighing them against the words and
actions of the other characters. When, for instance, Steele's new
girlfriend Laurel Gray, looks at him "funny," we wonder if
she knows.
In fact, the main female characters are the first to figure out that
Steele is the "Strangler" responsible for the rash of
murders in L.A. that year, as if they are attuned to what's happening
to others of their sex (almost an "instinctive" thing). The
men, meanwhile- the cops, detectives, even Steele- are narrow-minded
and unable to look past surfaces to make the necessary connections.
That we only slowly understand that Steele has taken over another
man's life (apartment, car, clothes) because...you know...he offed
the guy, is yet another reason why this book makes the hairs on the
back of your neck stand up.
Hughes
has offered us a fascinating and frightening look into the post-WWII
psyche, inviting us to question what could happen to a young American
man when he comes home from one of the most bloody and brutal wars in
modern history and attempts to fit back into "normal"
society. Did the war encourage the violent tendencies in Steele that
might have lain dormant otherwise? Or would he have become a killer
anyway? I intend to read more Hughes in the future, and I highly
recommend In a
Lonely Place.
It's so worth it.
No comments:
Post a Comment